Reliability is an important concept in psychology that has implications in research, assessment, and treatment. Reliability is the consistency of an individual’s behavior, feelings, thoughts, and responses over time, and is a crucial part of what we mean when we talk about psychological “validity”. Reliability is a cornerstone of psychological research and assessment, used to ensure that the data collected is accurate and reliable. Understanding reliability is also essential to psychological treatment, as clinicians rely on this concept to ensure that their observations and diagnoses are consistent and valid. This blog post will provide an overview of reliability in psychology and its implications for research, assessment, and treatment. It will also discuss why reliability is so important in the field of psychology, and how it can be used to improve our understanding of human behavior.
What is Reliability? | #Alevel Psychology
I believe that testing for reliability can be challenging in some circumstances. However, it is crucial to test for reliability whenever possible as this will raise the bar of the study and determine whether the findings can be applied to future research. If reliability is misused it can have serious negative consequences. For instance, Cyril Burt faked the results of a study he carried out to support his belief that intelligence is genetic. According to his research, the 11+ exams were implemented in schools and had an effect on educational policy for many years. Burt’s work was questioned, and it was discovered that his results were fabricated and thus unreliable.
However, not all research is reliable. For instance, because they frequently rely on case studies and other types of qualitative data, psychodynamic theories like those advanced by Sigmund Freud are challenging to evaluate for reliability. Therefore, these theories lack reliability. The question of how important reliability is raised by Freud’s influence in psychology and the widespread acceptance of his ideas.
Reliability is highly important for psychological research. This is because it determines whether the study achieves its intended goals and hypothesis and confirms that the findings are attributable to the study alone and not to any potential extraneous variables. If a study is credible, it may have beneficial effects on other psychological disciplines and be applied to solve problems. For instance, “the strange situation,” a study by Ainsworth and Bell on child attachments, was trustworthy because it consistently produced the expected outcomes when re-conducted (children of particular attachment types were observed to behave in the manner predicted of that attachment type). This made it possible to use the study to develop additional research in this area. Additionally, this study’s validity is universal, and its methodology is now widely accepted. This demonstrates how a study’s acceptability can be impacted by reliability.
This is accomplished by contrasting test results from each half with one another. There are several ways to divide a test in half, e g. or by odd and even numbers, first half and second half The test may have internal reliability if the results from the two halves are comparable.
You must cCreate an account to continue watching
You will also have unrestricted access to more than 84,000 lessons in math, science, history, and other subjects as a member. Get additional practice exams, tests, and individualized coaching to support your success.
Get unlimited access to over 84,000 lessons.
Numerous behavioral measures entail a significant amount of observer or rater judgment. is the degree to which different observers’ conclusions are consistent with one another. For instance, if you were interested in gauging the social abilities of university students, you could film them interacting with a new student. Then, you could ask two or more observers to watch the videos and grade how well each student interacts with others. The ratings of different observers should be highly correlated with one another, to the extent that each participant does, in fact, possess some level of social skills that can be noticed by a careful observer. Bandura’s Bobo doll study would have also measured inter-rater reliability. In this instance, there should have been a strong positive correlation between the observers’ assessments of the number of aggressive behaviors a particular child engaged in while playing with the Bobo doll. When making judgments that are quantitative, interrater reliability is frequently evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, or when making categorical judgments, Cohen’s alpha (the Greek letter kappa).
when the criterion is assessed at a later date (following the assessment of the construct)
The degree to which individuals’ results on a measurement are correlated with other factors that one would anticipate that they would be correlated
is how well a measure’s scores correspond to the variable it was designed to measure. We have already discussed one aspect that researchers consider—reliability—but how do they make this determination? Researchers should feel more confident that the scores accurately reflect the data when a measure has high test-retest reliability and internal consistency. But there must be more to it because a measurement can be very accurate but have zero validity. Imagine someone measuring someone’s self-esteem by placing a ruler next to their index finger because they think that length is a reflection of how they feel about themselves. Despite having very high test-retest reliability, this measurement would have zero validity. One’s index finger being one centimeter longer than another’s wouldn’t necessarily mean that person has a higher sense of self-worth.
Assessing convergent validity requires collecting data using the measure. To gauge how much people value and engage in thinking, researchers John Cacioppo and Richard Petty developed the self-report Need for Cognition Scale (Cacioppo & Petty, 1982). They demonstrated through a number of studies that people’s scores were positively correlated with their performance on a standardized academic achievement test and negatively correlated with their performance on a measure of dogmatism (which represents a propensity for obedience). The Need for Cognition Scale has been used in literally hundreds of studies since it was developed, and it has been discovered to be correlated with a wide range of other factors, such as the success of an advertisement, political interest, and jury decisions (Petty, Briol, Loersch, & McCaslin, 2009).
FAQ
What does reliability mean in psychology?
Reliability refers to the consistency of a measure. Internal consistency, consistency across items, and inter-rater reliability are the three types of consistency that psychologists take into account.
What does reliability mean and why is it important?
Reliability (or precision) refers to consistency. That is, if you use a tool or test multiple times, you ought to get consistent results. The data are thought to be unrelated to the phenomenon or concept being measured if the data (or the instrument) are unreliable.
What is reliability and why is it important in research?
Concepts like reliability and validity are used to assess the caliber of research. They demonstrate how accurately a technique, method, or test measures something. Validity is concerned with a measure’s accuracy, whereas reliability is concerned with a measure’s consistency.
Why is reliability necessary?
Test results that are not valid cannot provide a reliable estimate of the ability or trait that the test is intended to measure. Therefore, validity requires reliability, but reliability alone does not guarantee validity. The accuracy or repeatability of test results is referred to as reliability.
