Ring theory is a fundamental area of abstract algebra that focuses on algebraic structures known as rings. A ring consists of a set equipped with two binary operations – addition and multiplication – that satisfy certain properties. Mastering key concepts in ring theory is essential for excelling in technical interviews, especially for roles in mathematics, physics, engineering and computer science.
In this comprehensive guide, we will explore the most common ring theory interview questions, providing sample answers to help you ace your next interview.
What is a Ring?
The interviewer may first assess your foundational knowledge by asking you to define a ring
A ring is a set R equipped with two binary operations – addition (+) and multiplication (·) – such that
- R is an abelian group under addition, meaning:
- Addition is associative
- There exists an additive identity element 0
- Each element has an additive inverse
- Multiplication is associative
- Multiplication distributes over addition
Additionally, a ring contains a multiplicative identity element 1 such that 1·a = a·1 = a for all a in R.
The set of integers Z with the usual + and · operations is an example of a ring. The set of n x n matrices over a field is also a ring under matrix addition and multiplication.
Commutative vs Non-Commutative Rings
Interviewers often ask candidates to differentiate between commutative and non-commutative rings:
In a commutative ring, multiplication is commutative, meaning a·b = b·a for all elements a, b in the ring. The ring of integers Z is an example of a commutative ring.
In contrast, a non-commutative ring does not require multiplication to be commutative. For some elements a, b, we may have a·b ≠ b·a. An example is the ring of n x n matrices for n ≥ 2. Matrix multiplication is non-commutative, so this forms a non-commutative ring.
Ideals and Quotient Rings
You should be prepared to address questions on other central constructs like ideals and quotient rings:
An ideal I in a ring R is a subset that absorbs multiplication, meaning a·i is in I for all a in R and i in I. Quotient rings allow us to define a new ring structure by “quotienting” out an ideal, similar to modulo arithmetic.
If I is an ideal in R, the quotient ring R/I consists of cosets r + I for r in R with well-defined addition and multiplication. Quotient rings are useful in factoring polynomials and studying ring homomorphisms.
Ring Homomorphisms
Here’s how you can comprehensively explain ring homomorphisms:
A ring homomorphism f from a ring R to a ring S is a mapping that preserves the ring operations, i.e.:
- f(a + b) = f(a) + f(b) for all a, b in R
- f(a · b) = f(a) · f(b) for all a, b in R
- f(1R) = 1S where 1R and 1S are identity elements of R and S respectively
Ring homomorphisms allow us to transform problems from one ring to another while maintaining structure. An example is the quotient ring homomorphism that sends each element to its coset.
Polynomial Rings
Polynomial rings have extensive applications, so interviewers may test your knowledge in this area:
Let R be a ring. Then the polynomial ring R[x] consists of expressions ∑an xn where the coefficients an are elements of R. Addition and multiplication of polynomials is defined in the usual way – by adding/multiplying like terms.
Key properties:
- R[x] forms a ring
- If R is commutative, then R[x] is also commutative
- The units of R[x] are precisely the monic polynomials (leading coefficient 1)
Polynomial rings feature prominently in algebra, number theory and geometry. For instance, Z[x] comprises integer polynomial rings.
Examples and Applications
Interviewers want to assess how you can apply theoretical concepts, so you should walk through examples:
- Implement addition and multiplication methods to model a ring in code.
- Find an isomorphism between the quotient rings Z/10Z and Z/2Z x Z/5Z using the Chinese Remainder Theorem.
- Prove x2 + 1 is irreducible in Z[x] using the Rational Root Theorem.
- Demonstrate how modular arithmetic forms a ring with addition/multiplication modulo n.
Discuss how rings have applications in cryptography, coding theory, geometry, and more.
Advanced Concepts
For senior roles, you should aim to cover advanced topics like:
- Principal ideal domains and unique factorization domains
- Noetherian rings and Hilbert Basis Theorem
- Simple rings, semisimple rings and Artin-Wedderburn Theorem
- Prime and maximal ideals
- Field of fractions of an integral domain
- Polynomial factorization and Eisenstein’s criterion
- Finitely generated modules over a PID
Give high-level overviews of these concepts and their significance. Proving theorems may be too complex, but convey your intuition.
Final Tips
- Revise ring theory thoroughly as interviewers will probe your depths of knowledge here.
- Master definitions, key theorems and proofs.
- Use visuals like diagrams to explain concepts when beneficial.
- Practice defining rings, homomorphisms, ideals, quotient rings, polynomial rings, etc.
- Solve problems using rings to get comfortable applying concepts.
- Read advanced texts to strengthen foundations and handle complex questions.
With diligent preparation, you can excel at the ring theory questions in your upcoming interviews. Mastering this fundamental domain displays strong mathematical maturity and analytical skills prime for technical roles.
Sign up or log in Sign up using Google Sign up using Email and Password
Required, but never shown
7 Answers 7 Sorted by:
As far as I know, there is no model theoretic proof of Faltings Theorem itself. Hrushovskis proof applies only to algebraic varieties over function fields and fails for varieties over number fields.
And yet, one of Abraham Robinson’s last works, a paper he wrote with Roquette and published after his death, Robinson, A ; Roquette, P. On the finiteness theorem of Siegel and Mahler concerning Diophantine equations, J. A proof of Siegel’s theorem on the finiteness of the number of integral points on curves of positive genus is given in Number Theory 7 (1975), 121–176.
“The complex numbers are easy to deal with, whereas for the integers it is much harder…”
You may have heard that the full first-order theory of complex numbers with only the ring operations can be decided. This is the same as the theory of algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero. e. “computable”), as was first proved by Tarski. Of course, you could make a computer program that would let you type in any first-order sentence in the language of rings and, after a certain amount of time, tell you if that sentence is true in the complex numbers or not.
The ring of integers, on the other hand, doesn’t say that; the first-order theory of the integers isn’t clear. This is a theorem of Alonzo Church, and is closely related to Goedels famous incompleteness theorem.
The negative answer to Hilbert’s Tenth Problem is a different matter. This doesn’t follow directly from Church’s Theorem; Davis, Putnam, Julia Robinson, and Matiyasevich proved it much later.
I think of these ideas as more “logical folklore” than model theory itself. Any good book for beginners on mathematical logic (e.g. g. Endertons A Mathematical Introduction to Logic) will have a lot to say about them.
A reasonably good “beginners” book on model theory is David Markers Model Theory: An Introduction. I’m not sure if he talks about the specific examples you’re thinking of, but he does talk about quantifier elimination and probably other tools that would be used in the proofs you want.
This book starts on a quite basic level and is packed with small applications of model theory to ring theory. Nothing as deep as Mordell-Lang, but it gives a good impression of how it is possible at all to derive statements about rings using logic.
That you have to deal with things like this is shown in a good way: it is ridiculously easy to prove (Thm 1 (See page 13 of the source above) that any two algebraically closed fields with the same property satisfy the same first-order ring claims People are amazed at first and try to show something interesting about all char 0 fields by showing it for complex numbers. Then one notes: In the first order language of rings, it’s hard to say something interesting; all you can really say is polynomial equations. Often, the most important thing in these kinds of logic applications is to come up with a clever way to say what you want to say in a language that is easy for everyone to understand (e.g. g. you have to find axioms whose resulting theory then satisfies quantifier elimination).
Hrushovskis proof, as it is presented in Bouscarens book, is very involving. It requires a lot of background, technical ingredients, and, lets say, a certain dose of faith. It is not a one-liner at all. Id rather recommend reading a more straight forward approach to the ch.0 case (using jet spaces of differential fields) given by A. Pillay and M. Ziegler and written out very carefully by Paul Baginski in his undergrad thesis.
I’m not sure about “short,” but I think Ehud Hrushovski gave the model-theoretic proof for Mordell’s Conjecture (Fatling’s Theorem).
(EDIT: and just to clarify, Im quite sure the proof is a good deal more complex than elimination of quantifiers per se. Also, Terry Tao is currently holding a reading seminar aimed at understanding another, more recent, paper of Hrushovski).
You might find this book helpful, if you want to get into the details. Disclaimer: I found it while googling for something else and figured Id mention it. I havent read it myself.
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!.
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- If you say something based on your opinion, back it up with evidence or your own experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers. Draft saved Draft discarded
Ideals in Ring Theory (Abstract Algebra)
What is ring theory in mathematics?
The ring theory in Mathematics is an important topic in the area of abstract algebra where we study sets equipped with two operations addition (+) and multiplication (⋅). In this article, we will study rings in abstract algebra along with its definition, examples, properties and solved problems. Let R be a non-empty set.
Why are polynomial rings so ubiquitous in ring theory?
Polynomial rings are so ubiquitous in ring theory because they are built entirely out of addition and multiplication. Homomorphisms pass through these operations, making it very easy to define homomorphisms on polynomials.
From what field does the study of rings originate?
The study of rings has its origins in algebraic number theory, via rings that are generalizations and extensions of the integers, as well as in algebraic geometry, via rings of polynomials.
What is ideal in ring theory?
In ring theory the objects corresponding to normal subgroups are a special class of subrings called ideals. An ideal in a ring R R is a subring I I of R R such that if a a is in I I and r r is in R, R, then both ar a r and ra r a are in I; I; that is, rI ⊂ I r I ⊂ I and Ir ⊂ I I r ⊂ I for all r ∈ R. r ∈ R.
