Longitudinal studies employ continuous or repeated measures to follow particular individuals over prolonged periods of time—often years or decades. They are generally observational in nature, with quantitative and/or qualitative data being collected on any combination of exposures and outcomes, without any external influenced being applied. This study type is particularly useful for evaluating the relationship between risk factors and the development of disease, and the outcomes of treatments over different lengths of time. Similarly, because data is collected for given individuals within a predefined group, appropriate statistical testing may be employed to analyse change over time for the group as a whole, or for particular individuals (1).
In contrast, cross-sectional analysis is another study type that may analyse multiple variables at a given instance, but provides no information with regards to the influence of time on the variables measured—being static by its very nature. It is thus generally less valid for examining cause-and-effect relationships. Nonetheless, cross-sectional studies require less time to be set up, and may be considered for preliminary evaluations of association prior to embarking on cumbersome longitudinal-type studies.
Longitudinal research may take numerous different forms. They are generally observational, however, may also be experimental. Some of these are briefly discussed below:
Longitudinal cohort studies, particularly when conducted prospectively in their pure form, offer numerous benefits. These include:
Numerous challenges are implicit in the study design; particularly by virtue of this occurring over protracted time periods. We briefly consider the below:
When designing research studies in fields like medicine, psychology or education researchers have to decide whether to use a cross sectional or longitudinal approach. Both study designs have distinct advantages and disadvantages, so it’s important to understand the key differences between them.
In this article, I’ll explain cross sectional and longitudinal studies in simple terms, summarize the main similarities and differences, and provide examples of when each study design is most appropriate. My goal is to give you a clear understanding of these common research methods so you can determine which one fits your next research project.
What is a Cross Sectional Study?
A cross sectional study looks at data from a population at one specific point in time. The researcher collects data on multiple variables for different groups of people and compares them.
For example, a cross sectional study on exercise could survey three different age groups of people (20s, 40s, and 60s). It would measure their exercise habits and health markers like cholesterol at a single point in time. Then the researcher would analyze and compare the data between the three age groups.
Key features of cross sectional studies:
- Data is collected at one specific time point
- Allows comparison between different groups/subsets of a population
- Can examine multiple variables easily
- Provides a snapshot of the current situation
Cross sectional studies are quick, inexpensive, and can survey many variables However, because they only collect data at one time point, cross sectional studies cannot determine changes over time or infer cause-and-effect relationships.
What is a Longitudinal Study?
A longitudinal study collects data from the same group of people repeatedly over an extended timeframe. Unlike a cross sectional study, researchers take multiple measurements over time, allowing them to track changes within groups.
For example, a longitudinal study could survey a group of people in their 20s. It would collect data on their exercise and eating habits, weight, blood pressure, and cholesterol every five years over a 20 year period. This would enable the researcher to analyze how these measures change over time within the same group.
Key features of longitudinal studies:
- Data collected from the same group at multiple time points over time
- Tracks changes within groups over time
- Can establish sequence of events and detect causal relationships
- Expensive and time-consuming
The main advantage of longitudinal studies is the ability to measure changes over time. This can demonstrate development or patterns and help establish cause-and-effect relationships. However, these studies take much more time and money compared to cross sectional studies.
Key Differences Between Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Studies
While both are observational studies, cross sectional and longitudinal studies have some key differences:
- Timeframe – Cross sectional studies collect data at one time point, while longitudinal studies collect data over an extended period
- Groups studied – Cross sectional studies compare between different groups, longitudinal studies track changes within the same group
- Causality – Cross sectional studies cannot determine cause-and-effect relationships, but longitudinal studies can
- Number of variables – Cross sectional studies can easily examine multiple variables, longitudinal usually focus on fewer variables
- Cost and time – Cross sectional studies are quicker and cheaper; longitudinal studies take more time and money to conduct
This table summarizes the main differences:
| Cross Sectional Study | Longitudinal Study |
|---|---|
| One time point | Multiple time points |
| Different groups | Same group |
| No causality | Can determine causality |
| Multiple variables | Fewer variables |
| Cheaper/faster | More expensive/time consuming |
When Should You Use Each Study Design?
When deciding whether to use a cross sectional or longitudinal design, consider these factors:
Use a cross sectional study to:
- Get a snapshot of the current situation
- Make comparisons between different groups
- Examine associations between multiple variables
- Explore a new research area or gather preliminary data
Cross sectional studies are ideal for exploring the prevalence of a trait or issue within a population. For example, surveying exercise and eating habits across different age groups.
Use a longitudinal study to:
- Track changes over time within a group
- Determine cause-and-effect relationships
- Study development or patterns over a long period
- Avoid biases present in cross sectional studies
Longitudinal studies are best for researching long-term biological or behavioral changes. For instance, tracking cognitive decline as people age or monitoring childhood development.
If your resources permit, it can be useful to conduct an initial cross sectional study, then follow up with a longitudinal study on the most interesting findings.
Examples of Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Studies
Here are a few real-world examples that illustrate how cross sectional and longitudinal studies are used:
-
Cross sectional – A survey of Covid-19 vaccination rates amongst different age groups at a specific point in the pandemic. Compares vaccination rates between groups.
-
Longitudinal – The Framingham Heart Study collected health data from participants continuously for over 70 years, identifying key risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
-
Cross sectional – A study examining anxiety levels in middle school students and comparing levels between boys and girls.
-
Longitudinal – Research tracking a cohort of premature infants over 10 years to assess their long-term health, cognitive, and motor development.
-
Cross sectional – A survey evaluating job satisfaction and burnout among nurses in different hospital departments. Compares satisfaction between departments.
-
Longitudinal – A 5 year study following a group of patients with depression to evaluate the long-term effects of an experimental treatment program.
The Bottom Line
Cross sectional and longitudinal studies are two fundamental research designs used across many scientific fields. While both are observational studies, cross sectional studies collect data at a single time point to make between-group comparisons. Longitudinal studies gather data repeatedly on the same group over time to track changes within groups.
Cross sectional studies are quick, flexible, and inexpensive. They are useful for exploring the prevalence of traits or issues. Longitudinal studies require more time and resources but can establish cause-and-effect relationships and developmental patterns over time.
Consider your research aims, timeline, and budget when deciding which study design will provide the most valuable insights. With a clear understanding of the differences, you’ll be equipped to select the ideal approach for your next research project.
Embarking on a longitudinal study
Conducting longitudinal research is demanding in that it requires an appropriate infrastructure that is sufficiently robust to withstand the test of time, for the actual duration of the study. It is essential that the methods of data collection and recording are identical across the various study sites, as well as being standardised and consistent over time. Data must be classified according to the interval of measure, with all information pertaining to particular individuals also being linked by means of unique coding systems. Recording is facilitated, and accuracy increased, by adopting recognised classification systems for individual inputs (2).
Numerous variables are to be considered, and adequately controlled, when embarking on such a project. These include factors related the population being studied, and their environment; wherein stability in terms of geographical mobility and distribution, coupled with an ability to continue follow-up remotely in case of displacement, are key. It is furthermore essential to appropriately weigh the various measures, and classify these accordingly so as to facilitate the allocation effort at the data collection stage, and also guide the use of possibly limited funds (3). Additionally, the engagement and commitment of organisations contributing to the project is essential; and should be maintained and facilitated by means of regular training, communication and inclusion as possible.
The frequency and degree of sampling should vary according to the specific primary endpoints; and whether these are based primarily on absolute outcome or variation over time. Ethical and consent considerations are also specific to this type of research. All effort should be made to ensure maximal retention of participants; with exit interviews offering useful insight as to the reason for uncontrolled departures (3).
The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) (4) offers a series of tools and checklists that are designed to facilitate the evaluation of scientific quality of given literature. This may be extrapolated to critically assess a proposed study design. Additional depth of quality assessment is available through the use of various tools developed alongside the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines, including a structured 33-point checklist proposed by Tooth et al. in 2004 (5).
Following adequate design, the launch and implementation of longitudinal research projects may itself require a significant amount of time; particularly if being conducted at multiple remote sites. Time invested in this initial period will improve the accuracy of data eventually received, and contribute to the validity of the results. Regular monitoring of outcome measures, and focused review of any areas of concern is essential (3). These studies are dynamic, and necessitate regular updating of procedures and retraining of contributors, as dictated by events.
The statistical testing of longitudinal data necessitates the consideration of numerous factors. Central amongst these are (I) the linked nature of the data for an individual, despite separation in time; (II) the co-existence of fixed and dynamic variables; (III) potential for differences in time intervals between data instances, and (IV) the likely presence of missing data (6).
Commonly applied approaches (7) are discussed below: (I) univariate (ANOVA) and multivariate (MANOVA) analysis of variance is often adopted for longitudinal analysis. Note, in both cases, the assumption of equal interval lengths and normal distribution in all groups; and that only means are compared, sacrificing individual-specific data. (II) mixed-effect regression model (MRM) focuses specifically on individual change over time, whilst accounting for variation in the timing of repeated measures, and for missing or unequal data instances, and (III) generalised estimating equation (GEE) models that rely on the independence of individuals within the population to focus primarily on regression data (6).
With ever-growing computational abilities, the repertoire of statistical tests is ever expanding. In depth understanding and appropriate selection is increasingly more important to ensure meaningful results.
Inaccuracies in the analysis of longitudinal research are rampant, and most commonly arise when repeated hypothesis testing is applied to the data, as it would for cross-sectional studies. This leads to an underutilisation of available data, an underestimation of variability, and an increased likelihood of type II statistical error (false negative) (8).
Cross-Sectional Study vs Longitudinal Study: Pros, Cons & How To Choose (With Examples)
What is the difference between a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study?
While cross-sectional studies collect data from many subjects at a single point in time, longitudinal studies collect data repeatedly from the same subjects over time, often focusing on a smaller group of individuals that are connected by a common trait. Both types are useful for answering different kinds of research questions.
Why is a cross-sectional study cheaper than a longitudinal study?
This also often makes cross-sectional studies cheaper to perform than longitudinal ones. By comparison, a longitudinal study can take years or decades to complete because it requires researchers to gather data at multiple points in time.
Are cross-sectional and longitudinal studies observational studies?
Both the cross-sectional and the longitudinal studies are observational studies. This means that researchers record information about their subjects without manipulating the study environment.
What is a cross-sectional study?
Because you only collect data at a single point in time, cross-sectional studies are relatively cheap and less time-consuming than other types of research. Cross-sectional studies allow you to collect data from a large pool of subjects and compare differences between groups. Cross-sectional studies capture a specific moment in time.
