Co-branding, also known as composite branding, refers to two or more well-known brands collaborating to offer a new product or service. It can be an attractive proposition, allowing brands to share costs and leverage each other’s strengths However, co-branding also comes with risks, and partnering with the wrong brand could damage your reputation In this article, we’ll explore the major pros and cons of co-branding so you can decide if it’s right for your business.
The Potential Benefits of Co-Branding
First, let’s look at some of the key advantages that can make co-branding worthwhile:
1. Share Risks and Resources
Launching a new product involves substantial risk. Through co-branding, that risk is shared between two brands. You can also share manufacturing, distribution and marketing resources, lowering costs for both partners.
2. Wider Audience Reach
By combining your customer base with that of your co-branding partner, you can expand the target audience for your new offering This wider reach provides an opportunity to attract new customers
3. Improved Brand Image
Strategic co-branding with a respected brand can enhance your brand image. You’ll gain positive associations from being linked to their brand values and reputation.
4. Access to New Markets
Your co-branding partner may have expertise or a strong presence in markets you want to enter. Partnering provides a shortcut into new segments versus building them up yourself
5. Technology Sharing
Through alliances, brands can share proprietary technologies, processes and expertise. This can lead to better products with reduced R&D costs.
6. Increased Sales Potential
By combining brand strengths, co-branded products often benefit from expanded distribution and increased promotional reach. This can translate into higher sales than either brand could achieve alone.
7. Consumer Confidence
When recognized brands collaborate, customers often have more confidence in the new product compared to something launched by an unknown name. The halo effect from known brands reduces perceived purchasing risk.
Potential Disadvantages to Weigh
Of course, co-branding isn’t without its downsides. Here are some key cons to be aware of:
1. Partner Incompatibility
Divergent brand images and target audiences can make for an incompatible partnership. Conflicting brand identities may confuse customers rather than attracting them.
2. Loss of Exclusivity
By sharing brand elements like logos, you may dilute yourdistinctiveness. Exclusivity is a major brand asset, so loss of uniqueness is a risk.
3. Negative Associations
If your co-brand has any negative reputation issues, your brand can become tainted by association. Carefully vet potential partners to avoid aligning with the wrong brand values.
4. Disagreements and Conflicts
When two brands collaborate, there may be conflicts over strategy, resource allocation and decision-making. Legal partnerships can become complicated quickly.
5. Complex Coordination
Managing a partnership with shared objectives adds complexity versus running an initiative yourself. More resources may be required for project management and alignment.
6. Shared Profits
While co-branding can boost revenues, you also have to share the returns with your partner brand. Evaluate whether it makes sense financially compared to a solo initiative.
7. Risk of Failure
Partnerships don’t always work out as hoped. Just like any new product, a co-branded offering could underperform or even fail. This could damage your brand’s reputation and relationship with the partner.
Key Considerations for Evaluating Co-Branding
So when does co-branding make strategic sense? Here are some key considerations as you weigh up potential partnerships:
-
Brand fit: Do both brands share similar values, positioning, and target audiences? Strong brand fit improves the odds of success.
-
Partner reputation: Carefully vett potential partners and avoid aligning with brands that could damage your reputation.
-
Resource efficiency: Will sharing key costs and resources make the initiative more viable? Factor in added coordination costs too.
-
Market expansion: Does your potential partner have reach into new segments or geographies? Access to new markets is a key co-branding benefit.
-
Product synergy: Will a collaborative product provide more value than what each brand delivers separately? Look for real strategic synergy.
-
Shared vision: Do both partners share a common vision for the co-branded product and joint promotion? Alignment is crucial.
Co-branding can provide compelling advantages but also comes with serious risks. It’s critical to evaluate potential partners thoroughly and identify if there is real strategic value creation from combining brand strengths. While tricky to pull off, co-branding done right can accelerate growth by merging complementary brand assets. With careful partner selection and execution, composite branding could amplify your marketing. But make sure to weigh the pros and cons first before taking the partnership plunge.
Benefits and Disadvantages of Co-branding
There are some benefits that Co-branding can bring to brands including these four main factors below:
The first one is the development of market shares for both franchises. As a result, the co-branded brand will be able to draw in a wider range of customers. For example, one co-branded franchise can get the attention of customers who wanted sandwiches, and they can be likely to draw in the customers who want to try pasta as well.
Take the case of Horton’s franchises partnered with Cold Stone Creamery for instance. As Tim Horton does best in the morning and early afternoon, meanwhile, Cold Stone’s business works mostly in the late afternoon and early evening. When they are co-branded, then the increased customer traffic will be available at the stores for all day.
As co-branding enables individual franchises to share promotional and running costs, so national franchise brands can really take advantage of this. For instance, there are many buildings that have franchises from Taco Bell and Pizza Hut share the same location, or even the same staff, counter and kitchen as well. This is a big chance for business reinforcement.
As you can see, franchises are able to share a reputation via Co-branding. In case one brand is less renowned, meanwhile, the other in a successful co-branding situation, then the struggling one can really have a boost to their reputation from this marketing effort.
Also, consumers can really develop the optimistic associations with their favorite brands, which can transfer to the co-brand. Then, these brands can somehow generate the amount of royalty income as well as the increasing trust from customers over the product.
While collaborating, each company or brand can have the possibility to put their best people on this type of project, which will save the manpower costs and lessen the demand for outsourcing to maximize the value of two teams because they can come together and create one consistent marketing product.
However, there are still some drawbacks that brands might face while co-branding:
As the need of co-branding is about complex joint-venture and profit-sharing agreement, then reaching an agreement on co-branding can probably be a time-consuming and complicated process to do. It might take brands to reach to the lengthy negotiations and complicated legal agreements, and most franchise want to have the financial advantage over the other.
Meanwhile, the other brand can really feel like that brand is taking advantage of them. So, only there is an obvious fit between the two brands, then they can achieve the balance.
As there are various consumers, who would like to have competitive products for they to select. At the same time, there might be too many products for them to choose, as a result, consumer might get a feeling of confusion and loose their confidence. Despite the fact that the convenience of multiple choices under one campaign is good, but the confusion might take a consumer to give up finding and go to other different brand.
In spite of the compatibility among companies as they have their good matches from a product or service standpoint, there are still some internal cultures nowadays that are not compatible. When it comes to co-branding, it takes them a lot of to develop the relationships to understand the full potential of this venture as well.
Co-Branding – How does it work? Advantages, Types, Examples & Case studies of Co Brands (131)
FAQ
What are the advantages and disadvantages of co-branding?
What are the risks of co-branding?
What is the main advantage of co-branding?
Which of the following is a disadvantage to co-branding?
What are the pros and cons of co-branding?
As with everything business-related, even co-branding has certain pros and cons. Brands can share the risk. They can generate a royalty income. Bigger sales incomes. The customers would trust the product more. Joint advertising, which gives them a wider scope. Technological benefits.
Should Brands Co-brand?
These brands act together to offer a unique product or service, which they wouldn’t be able to offer individually. Of course, the success of this endeavour depends on their popularity and on how much they complement each other. As with everything business-related, even co-branding has certain pros and cons. Brands can share the risk.
What are the benefits of co-branding?
Co-branding offers many benefits to the companies involved, including: Reaches more people through increased visibility. Enables entry into new markets and segments. Enhances a brand’s reputation by collaborating with other trusted brands. Creates new and unique offerings by combining knowledge and resources.
Is co-branding a failure?
If the two products that the brands are using to develop their co-branding strategy are entirely different or popular in different markets, the co-branding might be a total failure. If the companies don’t share the same missions and visions, composite branding is a no-go. Co-branding can also have an adverse effect on partner brands.
